| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 5981 - 5985 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kodanad Service co-operative bank No. 1565 Building No. IX/261/E Kodanad Village Kurichilakkod Kara vs Satheesh et al regarding Order Execution Petition

Order Execution

E.P. 5/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-11-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumbavoor Urban Co Operative Society Ltd. vs Thankamani et al regarding Judgment Debt

Unknown

E.P. 141/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-11-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Eldho Varghese vs Mary Varghese et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.178/2024

2025-11-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between E.No. 307 Kunnathunad Service Co operative Society et al vs Raji et al regarding Monetary Decree

Monetary Decree

E.P. 39/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-11-17

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kodanad Service Cooperative bank vs Santha et al regarding EP closure

Civil

E.P. 6/2024

2025-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from court hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?