Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.178/2024

Case between Eldho Varghese vs Mary Varghese et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-18
Duration
Case Code No.
178
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Eldho Varghese sought to restrain defendants from trespassing his property after they demolished a portion of the compound wall.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Eldho Varghese
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Varghese
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M K Varghese
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Certified copy of settlement deed No. 199/2013 SRO Kuruppumpady, Certified copy of settlement deed No. 1297/2017, Tax receipt from Rayamangalam Village Office
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Evidence:
Evidence of PW1 and documents marked as Ext.A1 to A4 and C1, C1(a) supports the relief.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's exhibit used to support case
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's exhibit used to support case
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's exhibit used to support case
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's exhibit used to support case
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court exhibit submitted as evidence
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch by Adv. Sousen Ali submitted as evidence
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won