| Niyamam AI

Displaying 571 - 575 of 21836

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 237/2022

Kollam

2025-01-16

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Stephen George vs S.Noushad @ Kunjumon et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 613/2014

Kollam

2025-01-23

approximately-11 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ambili et al vs Nil regarding declaration of legal heirs and property rights

Civil Suit

OS. No.80/2024

Kollam

2025-01-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sujeesh Mohan vs Rajkumar.R. regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No.845/2022

Kollam

2025-01-23

approximately-2 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muttayya Konar vs Sankaralingam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 971/2013

Kollam

2025-01-24

approximately-11 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9620

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying batta, necessary for proceeding with their petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence showing respondent's financial means led to dismissal in multiple cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition dismissals occurred frequently when the petitioner failed to appear in court during hearings.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Dismissing cases due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps, like issuing notices or filings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?