| Niyamam AI

Displaying 391 - 395 of 21808

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding cancellation of certain clause in title deeds and for injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 675/2021

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-2 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between B Santhosh Kumar vs Sindhu Kumari regarding declaration and temporary prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 810/2023

Kollam

2025-08-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Ganga. L et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 645/2023

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-11 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulochana et al vs Rajendran regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No. 533/2017

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-8 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 675/2021

KOLLAM

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 4 months 27 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed due to not paying the mandatory court fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court for hearings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or to prove means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken

Petitioners failed to take necessary procedural steps in their cases, leading to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence

No Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?