| Niyamam AI

Displaying 366 - 370 of 21806

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 16/2020

Kollam

2025-08-23

approximately-5 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Suneer.A regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 180/2020

Kollam

2025-08-23

approximately-5 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayendran vs Yamunadevi regarding Injunction.

Injunction

OS. No. 854/2018

Kollam

2025-08-25

approximately-7 years 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aravindakshan vs Sujatha regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 84/2022

Kollam

2025-08-25

approximately-5 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. vs Smt. Amina Beevi regarding offence U/S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST.No. 284/2019

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-6 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees for batta, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove financial means or other claims resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

Failure to take necessary procedural steps led to multiple cases being dismissed for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Petitioners' absence during hearings often resulted in automatic case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?