| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2446 - 2450 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Sanju K et al regarding realization of amount

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 477 / 2020

Kozhikode

2025-09-27

approximately-5 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manappuram Chits India Ltd vs Prabeesh PK et al regarding mediation settlement

Arbitration

Arbitration Case No.01/2023

KOZHIKODE

2025-09-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V Doraswami vs 1C Muhammedali et al regarding fixation of fair rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 91/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-26

approximately-2 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hemanth Kumar.P vs K.P.Leela et al regarding partition of properties

Partition

FDIA 13/2023 in OS 167/2021

Kozhikode

2025-09-27

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harif PN et al vs Basheer PN et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 255 / 2021

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta required for their petitions.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or show respondents' financial means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from the court during proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary steps for their cases, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?