Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 477 / 2020

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Sanju K et al regarding realization of amount

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-09-27
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Closed
Sat, 09/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Punjab National Bank seeking recovery of funds mistakenly credited to the second defendant's account due to a technical error. The first defendant, Sanju K, is alleged to have issued a cheque despite insufficient funds in his account.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the first defendant to repay the amount mistakenly credited to the second defendant’s account due to a technical error.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant No. 1 is directed to pay ₹ 1,21,556.36 to the plaintiff with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the first defendant to repay the amount mistakenly credited to the second defendant’s account due to a technical error.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the funds were mistakenly credited due to a technical glitch and upheld the plaintiff's right to recover the amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the funds were mistakenly credited due to a technical glitch and upheld the plaintiff's right to recover the amount.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the above section, and the facts of the case, I have no hesitation to find that Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act is squarely applicable to the facts of this case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant No. 1 is directed to pay ₹ 1,21,556.36 to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realization of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Punjab National Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanju K
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Khader
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Cheque No.296514, Copy of letter issued by Punjab National Bank, Reply of letter issued by Sanju K.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K Narayanan Kutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K Arun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.N Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Premlal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.PV Sainudheen
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant No. 1 is directed to pay 1,21,556.36/- to the plaintiff with interest.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows: 1Defendant No. 1 is directed to pay 1,21,556.36/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty One Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Six and Thirty Six Paise only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Cheque No.296514 issued by Sanju K in favour of AK Abdulkhadar.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of letter issued by Punjab National Bank to Sanju K.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply of letter issued by Sanju K to Manager Punjab National Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of statement of account from 06.03.2018 to 16.09.2020 of Sanju K.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice with postal receipt issued by Adv.K Narayanan Kutty to Sanju K and another.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment Card.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unclaimed cover with acknowledgment card and postal receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued by Adv.K Narayanan kutty to Sanju K with postal receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy of power of attorney issued from Punjab National Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply of lawyer notice issued by Adv.S Premlal to Adv.K Narayanan kutty with postal cover.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization letter issued by Punjab National Bank to Rahul Sharma, Senior Manager.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Sanju K et al regarding realization of amount
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Sanju K et al regarding realization of amount

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 09/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 09/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Arabhi et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chathunni vs Kozhikode District Library Council et al regarding realisation of money
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ishani S. Nair vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sravan Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won