| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18466 - 18470 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhanu Haji et al vs Raihanath et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 389 OF 2015

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sulaiman Thaniveppil et al regarding EP 323/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130009102018

Malappuram

2019-02-13

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mathoorvalappil Mammi's daughter Fathima vs Ibrahim regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 328 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thottivalappil Muhammedkutty vs Paramban Mariyumma et al regarding settlement of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 109/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-14

4 years, 10 months, 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Rafi vs The Vikasana Kuries Limited, Theyyath Mohandas regarding 138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:192/2017

Tirur

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed due to non-payment of required court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence to prove claims or the means of the defendant resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Dismissal occurred when petitioners failed to appear in court or provide legal representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not issuing required notices to respondents in a timely manner.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?