Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 389 OF 2015

Case between Kunhanu Haji et al vs Raihanath et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-02-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Kunhanu Haji and Cherukkatt Valappil Pathumma, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Raihanath and Kunhumuhammed. The plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction, and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation by their counsel, while one defendant was present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default with costs to defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhanu Haji (66 years) Cherukkattil Valappil House, Anathavoor amsom, desom, Post Kanmanam, Tirur Taluk Cherukkatt Valappil Pathumma (60 years)

Defendants

Raihanath (29 years) Ayyappan Kavil House, Athavanad amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk. Pin: 676 301 Kunhumuhammed (55 years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases