| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18171 - 18175 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary vs Kunhimuhammed et al regarding execution proceedings

Execution Petition

EP 406/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-15

0 years, 6 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Chandran Kalan et al regarding loan closure

Execution Petition

EP 444/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-15

0 years, 6 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed kutty et al vs Shajahan regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 328 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk, Thrissur Dist.

2019-07-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Askar Chemancheri regarding EP

Execution Petition

KLML130002372019

Malappuram

2019-07-17

0 years, 4 months, 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Sukumaran Chettiyamthoid et al regarding Execution Petition.

Execution Petition

EP 100/2019

Malappuram

2019-07-17

0 years, 4 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence demonstrating the financial means of defendants to pay debts.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many petitions were dismissed for default due to plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary fees or batta.

Found in 28 cases (28%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Judgments were made against plaintiffs who were absent during proceedings, failing to represent their cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps such as issuing notices to defendants, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Petitioners

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?