Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 328 OF 2017

Case between Muhammed kutty et al vs Shajahan regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-07-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Muhammed kutty, Thajudheen, and Ahammed kutty are suing the defendant Shajahan for the realization of money. The court found that the balance court fee was not paid and rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the balance court fee was not paid, leading to the rejection of the plaint. As a result, the plaintiffs were unable to proceed with their claim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed kutty (56 years) Kummalil House, Ananthavoor amsom & Post, Konnallur desom, Tirur Taluk. Thajudheen (43 years) Madapeedikakkal House, Thozhuvanoor amsom & Post, Kavumpuram desom, Tirur Taluk. Ahammed kutty (68 years) Alukkal House, Kanmanam amsom & Post Panthavoor desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Shajahan (37 years) Vayyattu Kavil (H), Desamangalam amsom Pallam desom & Post, Thalappilli Taluk. PIN 679532.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaint for realisation of money was rejected.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk, Thrissur Dist.
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases