| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17706 - 17710 of 22119

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunnathunadu Housing Co Operative Society et al vs Dinesh et al regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

E.P. 204/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sambanna Curies Pvt. Ltd. vs George Kuriakose et al regarding satisfaction of decree

Execution Petition

OS No. 1935/2017

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumbavoor Urban Co Operative Society LTD vs Biju et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E.P. 143/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank Of India et al vs Jayachandran M R regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

OS No. 326/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Greeshma Johny et al regarding suit dismissal

Civil Suit

OS.133/2020

Perumbavoor

2025-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9755

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to not paying the required court fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Petitioners frequently missed court appearances, resulting in their cases being dismissed.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many petitions were dismissed because the required notices to defendants were not issued in time.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?