Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank Of India as the decree holder and Jayachandran M R as the judgment debtor regarding an execution petition. The court dismissed the execution petition due to the continuous absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has dismissed the execution petition due to the absence of the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent continuously.
The decree holder was absent continuously.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent continuously.
The decree holder was absent continuously.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent continuously.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank Of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayachandran M R
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- P G Dileep Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- C R Deepa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition dismissed due to decree holder's absence.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent continuously. Hence EP dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank Of India et al vs Jayachandran M R regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank Of India et al vs Jayachandran M R regarding execution petition