| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17296 - 17300 of 22086

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Emtex International Ltd. vs Baby Srambikkal et al regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

O.S No. 980/1999

Ernakulam

2025-05-19

approximately-7 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nandakumar Menon et al vs Ganesh Kumar K.G regarding decree satisfaction.

Execution Petition

E.P No. 28/2025 in RCP No. 138/2022

Ernakulam

2025-05-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Punjab National Bank vs AFRA Jalal et al regarding settlement of claims

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 304/2023

Ernakulam

2025-05-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harris Zain Sait vs M/s. Elegant Skill Tech Pvt. Ltd. regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E.P No. 90/2025

Ernakulam

2025-05-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Grace Cherian vs Suresh Babu. T. regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 142/2023

Ernakulam

2025-05-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9737

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to not paying required fees for court processes or notices.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed simply because the plaintiffs did not attend court hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals frequently resulted from plaintiffs failing to produce sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to take requisite procedural steps like issuing notices to relevant parties.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?