Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 142/2023

Case between Grace Cherian vs Suresh Babu. T. regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-05-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Grace Cherian filed a rent control petition against Suresh Babu. T. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to represent themselves and did not provide the necessary proof affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to represent themselves and did not provide the necessary proof affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner no representation. Respondent represented. No proof affidavit seen filed by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Grace Cherian
Party Age
81
Relation
W/o. Late J M Cherian
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu. T.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Krishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sindhu Santhalingam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.D. Shajan A.D.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saji Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amalendu A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed for default due to petitioner no representation.
Evidence:
Hence rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Grace Cherian vs Suresh Babu. T. regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Grace Cherian vs Suresh Babu. T. regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown