| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17226 - 17230 of 22110

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between DDRC Agilus Path Labs Ltd. et al vs Eltho Eloy Varghese regarding dismissal of suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No . 1114/2024

Ernakulam

2025-06-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M. Jothi Rajan vs Fiji Chacko Philip regarding settlement of a suit.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1594/2019

Ernakulam

2025-06-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Joseph J. Thayamkeril vs Mr. Kerala Varma Kunjikuttan Thampuran, Mrs. Reshma Sarah @ Reshma, Mrs. Rosy et al regarding suit dismissal.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 63/2019

2025-06-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Subaida P M et al vs Edapally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al regarding mediation agreement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 306/2024

Ernakulam

2025-06-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs M/s Malu's Catering et al regarding rejection of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No . 612/2023

Ernakulam

2025-06-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9747

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff's case was dismissed for failure to pay required advance costs, leading to case default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing the case due to insufficient evidence to demonstrate the financial means of the defendants.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiff failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissing the case due to the petitioner's absence during critical court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?