Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 63/2019

Case between Joseph J. Thayamkeril vs Mr. Kerala Varma Kunjikuttan Thampuran, Mrs. Reshma Sarah @ Reshma, Mrs. Rosy et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph J. Thayamkeril is the plaintiff in a suit that was dismissed as abated due to the absence of the sole plaintiff. The defendants included multiple parties represented in the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the sole plaintiff's unavailability and lack of representation. All pending interim applications were closed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed as abated. All pending I.A’s closed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph J. Thayamkeril (67 years) Ayyanat Thayamkeril, Oli Mana, Kumbalam desom and Village, Kanayannur Taluk. Ernakulam District, Kochi - 682 506.

Defendants

Mr. Kerala Varma Kunjikuttan Thampuran (98 years) now residing in Kunnth Lane (Cross Road), Near Thiruvambady Road, Poomkunnam P.O., Thrissur. Mrs. Reshma Sarah @ Reshma (41 years) now residing at No. 2B, Concert O' Castle, Panamoilly Nagar, Elamkulam Village, Kanavannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Mrs. Rosy (63 years) now residing at No. 6A, West Gate Terrace, Pandit Karuppan PWD Road, Thevara desom,Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District and Thevara P.O., Kochi - 682013. M/s. Orange Tree Properties (Age not specified years) having Administrative Office: ‘Divya Sree Chambers' No. 11, O' Shaugnnessy Road, Bengaluru - 560 025. Mr. Bhaskar N. Raju (46 years) residing at No. 32, 1st ‘A' Cross, RMV Extension, Bengaluru - 560 080.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the sole plaintiff no longer being available and no steps taken to implead legal heirs.
Evidence:
Sole Plaintiff no more and no representation and no steps taken to implead Legal Heirs. Hence suit dismissed as abated.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases