| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17091 - 17095 of 22150

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Emmanual vs Antony Andrews regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1275 / 2018

Ernakulam

2025-08-23

approximately-7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M.R.Ajayakumar vs The Regional Manager regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 50/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.X. Paul P. Joseph et al vs Olive Foods regarding compliance of rent control orders.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 100/2024

ERNAKULAM

2025-08-22

approximately-1 month 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Spiceland Holidays and Entertainments Pvt. Ltd. vs Jaimon Joseph et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 118/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Roy P G regarding mediation agreement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 549/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9770

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or costs, leading to dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Insufficient evidence provided to establish claims or show means to pay debts resulted in dismissals.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Petitioners often failed to appear in court, causing automatic dismissals of cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioners' inaction regarding necessary procedural steps.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?