| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1516 - 1520 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sheeba vs Raveendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.

Civil Suit

OS 47/2025

2025-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Devi. V. P vs Anil V. P, Latha. V. P regarding partition of property.

Final Decree Application

FDIA 6/2025 in OS 128/2021

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-11-29

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anil V. P et al vs Devi. V. P regarding final decree of partition

Civil Suit

OS 128/2021

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-11-29

approximately-3 years 2 months 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024

Nadapuram, Vatakara Taluk, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024

Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate means of payment by the defendants resulted in case failure.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken by Plaintiff

Many plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, resulting in their cases being dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition dismissals frequently occurred due to the absence of the petitioners from court hearings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken by Plaintiff

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?