| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1381 - 1385 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Muhammed Rinas et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.180/2024

Kottayam

2025-03-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Girish Kumar et al vs Allikutty et al regarding Compromise

Civil Suit

O.S No.657/2013

Kottayam

2025-03-27

approximately-11 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose George vs Jacob Thomas regarding local body election candidacy

Election Petition

Election Op. No. 3/2021

Kottayam

2025-03-28

approximately-4 months 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Allikkutty et al vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding compromise petition.

Civil Suit

O.S No.82/2014

Kottayam

2025-03-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. Boney Pilo et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No.665/2019

Kottayam

2025-03-28

approximately-6 years 9 months

Partial

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default in several cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents contributed to the dismissal of numerous petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

The absence of the petitioner during hearings was a recurring reason for the dismissal of petitions.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?