Case Summary
The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, is seeking the repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, who are guarantors for the loan. The defendants defaulted on the repayment, leading the plaintiff to file this suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹2,94,105 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff the sum of ₹2,94,105 with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments and evidence established the case of the plaintiff, with no rebuttal from the defendants.
The plaint averments and evidence established the case of the plaintiff, with no rebuttal from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments and evidence established the case of the plaintiff, with no rebuttal from the defendants.
The plaint averments and evidence established the case of the plaintiff, with no rebuttal from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹2,94,105 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employers Service Society
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr.M.V. Josekutty
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Rinas
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haji Mohammed Rafeek
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rifna Muhammed
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- D/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Barakkathulla M
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/O
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorization letter, Loan Application, Demand Promissory Note, Agreement.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu J Varapally
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Simeon Abraham Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,94,105₹ (Rupees Two Lakh Ninety Four Thousand One Hundred and Five only) with interest thereon...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
True extract of the working committee meeting
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the structure and functioning of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Authorization letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorized the member to represent the plaintiff society in the court.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Bye law of the society
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided insights into the operational policies of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Photocopy of registration certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the legal registration of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Letter issued by District Registrar, Kottayam
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document validated the plaintiff's operation under local regulations.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Loan Application
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlined the request for the loan by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was executed as a formal agreement to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document detailed the terms of the loan agreement between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Consent letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document showed the agreement of the defendants to certain terms related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Office copy of Lawyers notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was the formal demand for payment sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Postal Receipts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents served as proof of the notice being sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type:
Returned Postal Articles of the Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents confirmed the non-delivery of the demand notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type:
Computer printout of the original data of accounts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided detailed account information regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Muhammed Rinas et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Muhammed Rinas et al regarding realization of money