| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1341 - 1345 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Pradeep M.M et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.79/2025

Kottayam

2025-04-10

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 63 /2021

KOTTAYAM

2025-04-16

approximately-2 years 8 months 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.77/2025

Kottayam

2025-04-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Pradeep M.M et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.78/2025

Kottayam

2025-04-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Tessy Joseph et al vs Selvaraj regarding non-payment of rent

Rent Control Application

R.C (OP) No. 5/2025

KOTTAYAM

2025-04-11

approximately-1 year 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings, showing lack of engagement.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps to issue notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of the Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?