Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.78/2025

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Pradeep M.M et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Mathew and Sons Finance, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants. The defendants, who approached the plaintiff for a loan of ₹2,00,000, have defaulted on payments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹1,43,000 with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹1,43,000 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹1,43,000 with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments, affidavit and documents established the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments, affidavit and documents established the case of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,43,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Forty Three Thousand only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Mathew and Sons Finance
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep M.M
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswathy E.P
Party Age
27
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thulasi Mohanan
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan cum Guarantee Agreement, Voucher, Promissory Note, Office copy of Lawyer's Notice, Computer print out of Loan account statement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roy Vanchipurackal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks to recover an amount of ₹1,43,000 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,43,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Forty Three Thousand only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Cum Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions of the loan agreement entered into by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Voucher
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the receipt of the loan amount by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note confirms the defendants' obligation to repay the loan amount to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants reminding them of their obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants reminding them of their obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement details the loan repayment schedule and the payments made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Pradeep M.M et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Pradeep M.M et al regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sat, 05/04/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Susamma et al regarding realization of money.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sundaran V.S. et al regarding realization of money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Biju A N et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won