| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1326 - 1330 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sasikumar vs Ratheesh Yesudas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 404/2024

Kottayam

2025-07-29

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob P George vs Moncy T Maliakal et al regarding a civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 215/2020

Kottayam

2025-07-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Plamena K.X vs P.K. Varghese regarding eviction and damages

Civil Suit

O.S. 315/2020

Kottayam

2025-07-30

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Babu George vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co.Operative Consumer Stores Ltd. regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

E.P 72/2023

Kottayam

2025-07-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nisha Suresh @ Nisha A K vs Kurian Thomas @ Baby et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No.827/2017

Kottayam

2025-07-31

approximately-7 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings, showing lack of engagement.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps to issue notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of the Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?