Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 315/2020

Case between Plamena K.X vs P.K. Varghese regarding eviction and damages

Court
Addl. Munsiff's Court
Judge
Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months
Case Code No.
315
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plamena K.X, the plaintiff, is seeking eviction and damages from the defendant, P.K. Varghese, for failing to pay rent for a leased property. The court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated, leading to a favorable judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay the amount due for unpaid rent and damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to recover possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff and pay Rs. 37,702/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay the amount due for unpaid rent and damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court established that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and there was no evidence contradicting the plaintiff's claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court established that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and there was no evidence contradicting the plaintiff's claim.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to recover the possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within three months.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Plamena K.X
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.K. Varghese
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the sale deed, Ownership Certificate, Building Tax Receipt, Tax Receipt, notice issued to the defendant, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment Card, Lawyer notice, reply notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment Card, Rent agreement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Karjet
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is ordered to vacate the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to recover the possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff within three months and to evict the defendant from the plaint schedule property through the process of court.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff Rs. 37,702/- with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs. 37,702/- (Rupees Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Two Only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum, from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is ordered to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month until vacating the property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month with 6% interest per annum to the plaintiff till the defendant vacate the plaint schedule building.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the ownership of the plaintiff over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the tax payments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further supports the claim of ownership through tax documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Terminated the lease arrangement and demanded arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves delivery of the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by counsel related to the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the defendant's counsel regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the reply notice.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows receipt of the reply notice.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the lease terms between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/15/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Varkey Abraham vs Manikandam Nair regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Partial
Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Boobily Peter vs Reliance Infratel Limited regarding injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Omana Markose vs P.O Devarsykutty, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jose Mathew et al vs K.S.Ninan regarding arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won