Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 299/2017

Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-8 years 0 days
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bobby Mani, the plaintiff, is seeking recovery of damages and rent arrears from the Kerala State Beverages Corporation, the defendant. The case involves a tenancy dispute over a building used for liquor sales.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹45,823 towards arrears of rent and damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay ₹45,823/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹45,823 towards arrears of rent and damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence supported the plaintiff's claim regarding unpaid rent and damages.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence supported the plaintiff's claim regarding unpaid rent and damages.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is entitled to receive the arrears of rent for the period from 01.12.2016 to 10.02.2017.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹45,823/- from 01.12.2016 to 10.02.2017 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for amount of Rs.45,823/- from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bobby Mani
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Kerala State Beverages Corporation
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, The Kerala State Beverages Corporation
Plaintiffs Documents
Various notices regarding tenancy and damages.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Karjet
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Subhash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunish G Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sasikumar P R Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was entitled to recover arrears of rent and damages from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the light of the above discussion, it can be concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to receive the arrears of rent for the period from 01.12.2016 to 10.02.2017.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by the 1st defendant informing the plaintiff of their intention to vacate the building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice informing that the building should be handed over to the plaintiff in its previous condition.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by the 1st defendant stating that business has ceased and the key would be returned after account settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: List of Damages
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
List indicating damages amounting to Rs.57,100/- noted during the inspection.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice informing that the retail outlet had been relocated and requesting key collection.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building Tax Receipt for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Revenue Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Revenue Tax Receipt issued by Muttambalam Village.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Adv. Akash K R documenting the damage.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Adv. Noble Joseph with photographs of the building's condition.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.
Case Code Year
Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Biju M R vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sanumon P S vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissed suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Valsamma Varghese vs State Of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between James P.George et al vs Pallikathodu Gramapanchayat et al regarding declaration and injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won