| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1031 - 1035 of 21884

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sarojini vs Komalam et al regarding recovery of share and declaration of document as void.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 604/2023

Kottayam

2025-10-16

approximately-2 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Chikku Nainan et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 281/2022

Kottayam District

2025-10-24

approximately-11 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V P Jacob et al vs Chacko et al regarding settlement of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No.538/2017

Kottayam

2025-10-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sebastian K J et al vs Lisamma Alexander et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 776/2017

Kottayam District

2025-10-29

approximately-8 years 3 months

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Suresh Babu et al vs Vinod et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 313/2021

Kottayam

2025-10-28

approximately-4 years 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases lacked sufficient evidence demonstrating the respondent's ability to pay the decree debt.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Multiple plaintiffs did not take necessary legal steps, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?