Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 776/2017

Case between Sebastian K J et al vs Lisamma Alexander et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-8 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sebastian K J and others, are claiming ownership and possession of a property against the defendants, Lisamma Alexander and others, for fixation of boundaries and preventing trespass. The plaintiffs assert their right based on a prior agreement to purchase a portion of land which the defendants dispute.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed as the plaintiffs could not establish their claim to the property.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction was dismissed as the plaintiffs could not establish their claim to the property.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sebastian K J
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
John K J
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose K Joseph
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jomol Joseph
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lisamma Alexander
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jijo Alex
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju Alex
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu Alex
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rubymol Alex
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate of purchase of Kudikidappu no. 259 in OA 1539/70, Tax Receipt dated 21.04.2017, Cash Receipt dated 19.08.2017, Death Certificate, Copy of Sale Deed no. 2983/1979.
Defendants Documents
Tax Receipt dated 10.04.2024.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P John Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajith C George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G Jayasankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs requested an injunction to prevent trespassing by the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs could not establish their right and possession over plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Fixation of Boundary
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought to fix the western and southern boundary of plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs failed to establish necessity for boundary fixation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kudikidappu Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiffs' claim of ownership over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the payment of land tax, supporting the plaintiffs' claim to ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of transaction related to the property, although not decisive for ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Identifies the deceased owner of the property, relevant to the plaintiffs' heirship.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the property's ownership history, crucial for addressing competing claims.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supports the defendants' claims regarding property ownership and tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details the boundary and condition of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of property and boundary conditions being contested.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sebastian K J et al vs Lisamma Alexander et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sebastian K J et al vs Lisamma Alexander et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won