| Niyamam AI

Displaying 951 - 955 of 21881

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Preethi vs Jyothis Jose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 168/2017

Pala

2025-10-31

approximately-8 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Biju @Sunil P. T vs Aneesh P. T regarding partition and fixation of boundary

Civil Suit

O.S No. 246/2018

Pala

2025-10-31

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Brijit @ Chinnamma vs P J Thomas et al regarding a suit settled by compromise.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 52/2022

Pala

2025-11-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohanan vs Abhilash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 22/2022

Pala, Kerala

2025-10-31

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose J. Edavoor et al vs Devasya regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 205/2019

Pala

2025-11-05

approximately-6 years 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9638

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases highlighted the failure of plaintiffs to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissals frequently occurred due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps or issue notices.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?