Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 22/2022

Case between Mohanan vs Abhilash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohanan filed a suit against Abhilash and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a pathway that he claims is a public road. The defendants are accused of trying to convert this public pathway into a private road.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed O.S No. 22/2022 and decreed O.S No. 199/2022, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the plaintiff's beneficial enjoyment of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against trespassing into the plaint schedule No.2 property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed O.S No. 22/2022 and decreed O.S No. 199/2022, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the plaintiff's beneficial enjoyment of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove that he has any exclusive right over the plaint schedule No.2 property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is clear that the way commences from the public road to the south, and it proceeds north and terminates at the house of the defendant. The plaintiff could not prove that schedule No.2 property is a public road being used by the public from time immemorial.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the OS No.22/2022 is dismissed, and OS No.199/2022 is decreed as follows: (1) The defendant and men under him are hereby restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule No.2 property and construction of plaint schedule item No.2 into a road and beneficial enjoyment of the plaint schedule item No.2 property as a road.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhilash
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhash
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Martin
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partition Deed No. 316/1984, Land Revenue Tax receipt No. KL05041105896/2021
Defendants Documents
Will Deed No. 66/III/2020, Settlement Deed No. 74/2022, Bill from Pazhayampallil Earth Movers, Land Revenue tax receipt No. KL05041107737/2021, Land Revenue tax receipt No. KL05041103852/2023, Letter received from Police Station, Pala, Caveat OP filed before the Munsiff’s Court, Pala, Site Plan received from SRO, Meenachil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. R Sreenivasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunny Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sam Sunny
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing the road.
Evidence:
The Issues Nos. 1 and 2 in OS No. 22/2022 are found against the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff in OS No. 199/2022 sought a prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and obstructing the road construction.
Evidence:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving that he is having title and possession over the plaint schedule Nos. 1 and 2 properties and the defendant failed to adduce any evidence to prove that he is having any right over the plaint schedule item Nos. 1 and 2 properties.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed No. 316/1984 of SRO, Meenachil which shows the plaintiff's title to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Revenue Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Revenue Tax receipt No. KL05041105896/2021 indicating payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Will Deed No. 66/III/2020 of SRO, Meenachil reflecting the defendant's claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Settlement Deed No. 74/2022 of SRO, Meenachil pertaining to defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Bill from Pazhayampallil Earth Movers SR. No. 805, relevant to expenses incurred by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Land Revenue Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Revenue tax receipt No. KL05041107737/2021 related to the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Land Revenue Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Revenue tax receipt No. KL05041103852/2023 concerning property tax.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Letter received from Police Station, Pala relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of application to Police Station, Pala pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B6(a)
Document Type: Caveat OP
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Caveat OP filed before the Munsiff’s Court, Pala indicating legal proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Site Plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Site Plan received from SRO, Meenachil illustrating the property layout.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Adv. Commissioner Smt. Neenu Elizabeth Sebastian providing evidence on the property condition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough Sketch filed by Adv. Commissioner Smt. Neenu Elizabeth Sebastian related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed by Adv. Emmanuel Cyriac containing findings on the property issue.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough Sketch filed by Adv. Commissioner Emmanuel Cyriac accompanying the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohanan vs Abhilash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mohanan vs Abhilash et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Pala, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Sun, 01/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Jancy Thomas regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hima K.S et al regarding settlement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jilu Sebastian et al vs Mercy Pious et al regarding Suit dismissed as not pressed
MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash P. M vs Anoop P regarding settlement of a suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sukumaran Nair et al vs Thomas et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won