| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 8036 - 8040 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Muhammed vs Parayil Moideen Kutty et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No.238 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-01-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Namrattu Kizhakkepat Kuttisankaran Nair vs Mannath Moosa et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 173 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-01-18

4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Edarikkod Service Co operative Bank vs Thirunnavaya Kalathil Hamza et al regarding loan recovery

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 184 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-01-18

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd. vs Mohammed Riyas regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:121/2015

Tirur

2017-01-18

Approximately 1 year, 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nambunni vs Vasudevan regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 134 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-01-17

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to pay required batta for processing.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence supporting their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or petitioner at hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Petitioners often failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?