| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 7866 - 7870 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mammukutty Haji vs Mariyam regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:140/2015

Tirur

2017-05-22

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Muhammed Shafi regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No. 34/2017

Tirur

2017-05-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd. vs Manala Cheerangan regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No. 4/2017

Tirur

2017-05-02

1 year 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mohamed Ashraf vs Kambala Mohamed Abdul Noor regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

ST.47/2015

Tirur

2017-04-27

2 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Challenge Motors vs Radhika regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

Criminal Case - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

ST/10/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-24

0 years, 10 months, 24 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

18%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta for proceeding with their cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to present necessary evidence to support their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Numerous petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps to advance their cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Several cases resulted in dismissal due to the absence of the petitioners during hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?