Case Summary
Private complaint alleging dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act where the accused was acquitted due to complainant's continuous absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act due to the continuous absence of the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
The complainant is continuously absent. Even after giving repeated chances for evidence, no affidavit also filed. No reason rendered for non-appearance, No application is filed. Hence accused is acquitted U/s 256(1) Crpc.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) CrPC for the offence u/s 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Dishonour of cheque
Case Code
Case between Mammukutty Haji vs Mariyam regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Mammukutty Haji vs Mariyam regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour