| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 4901 - 4905 of 5176

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Pottengal Parangodan kutty's children et al vs Kummarambil Parangodan's children et al regarding Civil Procedure Code

Civil Suit - Application under Order 26 Rule 13 of CPC

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 628 OF 2008

Tirur

2017-12-15

4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Sahakarana Bank vs Rajeshkumar Chittilapally regarding default judgment

Civil Suit

EP 44/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-04

0 years, 9 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Pilakkal Ayisha Beevi vs Pilakkal Alikkutty's children et al regarding undisclosed matter

Civil Suit - Interlocutory Application

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 2452 OF 2000

Tirur

2017-12-01

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sakkariya vs Kinatteri Parambil Dharmman regarding unknown matter

Civil Suit - Unknown

Restor.] 2056/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-23

0 years, 3 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ismail vs Hussain regarding Restoration of Suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2462 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-10-13

1 year 1 month 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

40%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 5,176 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 198 cases)
Commission Report (in 190 cases)
Tax receipt (in 94 cases)
Oral Evidence (in 73 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 56 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2087
Defendant Won: 2566

2566

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Document Production

Insufficient documentation by plaintiffs resulted in dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often neglected to issue necessary notices, causing the court to dismiss their petitions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Failure to pay required costs led a significant number of dismissals for plaintiffs.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Lack of Document Production

Failure to Issue Notices

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?