Case Summary
The plaintiff filed an application for restoration of the suit under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was allowed with costs of Rs.1000 to Legal Service Authority.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration of the suit with costs of Rs.1000 to the Legal Service Authority.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA 2462/17 restored the suit with costs of Rs.1000 to Legal Service Authority.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ismail
- Relation
- S/o Thekkath Alavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hussain
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o Machingal Moideenkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Najmudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of the suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoring the suit under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Evidence:
IA 2462/17 restored the suit with costs of Rs.1000 to Legal Service Authority.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ismail vs Hussain regarding Restoration of Suit
Case Code Year
Case between Ismail vs Hussain regarding Restoration of Suit