| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10981 - 10985 of 15269

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Beena Antony et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

OS.No.1579/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Arun Kumar M S vs Sukumaran Nair et al regarding compromise settlement

Civil Suit

O.S. No.251/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The State Bank of India vs Vishnu S Nair regarding settlement in adalath.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.391/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ajith Karunakaran et al vs Mohammed Thaha regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.455/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Geetha Divakaran et al vs Rajmohanan Nair et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

OS.No.765/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-23

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8230

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to automatic dismissal of their cases.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often did not submit required documentation, which resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation and Inaction

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to take necessary steps and not having legal representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Plaintiffs failed to pay required costs or fees, causing their petitions to be dismissed.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Lack of Representation and Inaction

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?