Case Summary
Ajith Karunakaran and his father as representatives are the plaintiffs, while Mohammed Thaha is the defendant. The case was settled between the parties and dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as not pressed after the parties settled the matter.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajith Karunakaran
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K Karunakaran Unnithan
- Party Age
- 88
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Thaha
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S Unnikrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ashwin Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vettoor S Prakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Jayasree L.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anu K.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajith Karunakaran et al vs Mohammed Thaha regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Ajith Karunakaran et al vs Mohammed Thaha regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement