| Niyamam AI

Displaying 126 - 130 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Arshad P.P. vs Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd. et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1028/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-26

0 years, 6 months, 3 days

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Kozhippurath Hamza vs Parambadan Abdul Nazer regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 378/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-09

0 years, 7 months, 12 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu vs Saidu Haji, The Federal Bank regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn/548/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-08-19

0 years, 6 months, 18 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Basheer Cholakkal Pottachola et al vs C.C.Muhammedkutty et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 581/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-08-19

0 years, 6 months, 8 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Abdulla regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

Restor.Pt 505/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-05-28

0 years, 3 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34.48%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (34.48%) High Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Many plaintiffs did not appear in court, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 13 cases (22.41%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Some cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' inability to submit required documents and evidence.

Found in 7 cases (12.07%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

The absence of petitioners during hearings resulted in multiple case dismissals for default.

Found in 7 cases (12.07%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation in Court

Failure to Produce Documents

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?