Restoration Petition 1028/2016

Case between Arshad P.P. vs Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd. et al regarding restoration petition

Court

Court of the Munsiff Magistrate

Judge

Smt. Vincy TV

Order Date

2016-09-26

Duration

0 years, 6 months, 3 days

Case Closed

Mon, 09/26/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arshad P.P. filed a restoration petition against Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd., State of Kerala, and Joint R.T.O. seeking relief.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Petitioner

Relief Granted

Allowed restoration of petition

Case Type

Restoration Petition

Final Judgment

The petitioner's restoration petition was allowed, and respondents were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1000 each.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Allowed on cost of Rs 1000/- each to respondents

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: State of Kerala

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Joint R.T.O.

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Petitioner
Advocate Name: Irshad K.K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Irshad K.K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Advocate
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Advocate
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Restoration petition was allowed

Evidence: