| Niyamam AI

Displaying 26 - 30 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aji George vs Earnest.A. et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No. 789/2022

Kollam

2025-06-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jithkumar.B vs Thankappan.P et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No. 79/2024

Kollam District

2025-06-16

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No.498/2021

Kollam

2025-03-18

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shameer et al vs Manek Sha John regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS.No.620/2024

KOLLAM

2025-03-20

approximately-1 year 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.210/2025

Kollam District

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

First page
Previous page
…
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
…
Next page
Last page

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Multiple dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs failing to appear during hearings, leading to automatic case dismissals.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims or legal arguments.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Counsel Issues

Dismissals occurred when the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions or was absent, affecting case presentation.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Properly Press Case

Several suits were dismissed as the plaintiffs or their counsels did not actively press or pursue their claims.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Counsel Issues

Failure to Properly Press Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?