Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.498/2021

Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
approximately-4 years 2 months
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Geetha.B. and Jayaprakash, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are allegedly causing obstructions to their enjoyment of scheduled properties. The defendants have denied the plaintiffs' claims, asserting that the sale deed is fraudulent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from obstructing their enjoyment of the property. The counterclaim by the defendants was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are restrained from causing any obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by plaintiffs.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from obstructing their enjoyment of the property. The counterclaim by the defendants was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved their ownership and possession of the property with credible evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have succeeded in proving their case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendants and their men are restrained from causing any obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by plaintiffs and committing any waste or damage to the property by cutting and removing trees from the property and causing any kind of damage to the building situated therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha.B.
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayaprakash
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhusoodhanan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhuvanadasan
Party Age
56
Relation
Retired SI.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.Geetha @ Lissy
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.Girija
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement deed No.4677/1986, Sale deed No.429/1990, Land Tax receipt dated 31/08/2021, Building Tax receipt dated 31/08/2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R.Mohana Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Syamaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraint on the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' enjoyment of the property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained from causing any obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by plaintiffs.
Relief Type: Counter Claim Dismissal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissal of the counter claim filed by the defendants.
Evidence:
Counter claim is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale deed establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt as proof of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipt as proof of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate of land measurement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Possession evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A6 series
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt for the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Police Petition Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of complaint made by the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of recent settlement deed.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt evidencing ongoing property tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 03/18/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Saboora Beevi vs Seenath regarding Injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between The Deity, Pavoor Thekkathil Sree Bhadra Devi Temple et al vs K.K.Vijayan regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Anil Kumar Celine Fernandez et al vs Socrates John regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won