Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 937/2023

Case between Saboora Beevi vs Seenath regarding Injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into their property. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have no right to use the pathway that leads to their eastern property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession of plaint C schedule pathway, supported by various evidences.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession of plaint C schedule pathway, supported by various evidences.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to get the reliefs as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saboora Beevi
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabeer
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seenath
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nadirsha
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Correction Deed No. 423/2021, Copy of Correction Deed No. 424/2021, Tax receipt dated 23/03/2023, Tax receipt dated 10/05/2019, Certified copy of Judgment in OS No. 721/2012.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Seema.C.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Unnikrishnan.S.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway and from making use of the plaint C schedule pathway for any kind of accessibility or passage by the defendants to reach the eastern property of them.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway and from making use of the plaint C schedule pathway for any kind of accessibility or passage by the defendants to reach the eastern property of them and also from committing any waste therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: ii. Plaintiffs are also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of Settlement Deed No. 818/2018 (Subject to Proof)
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of Settlement Deed No. 819/2018 (Subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Correction Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Correction Deed No. 423/2021
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Correction Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Correction Deed No. 424/2021
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt dated 23/03/2023
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt dated 10/05/2019
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Judgment in OS. 721/2012 of Munsiff Court, Kollam dated 25/01/2019
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Resurvey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Resurvey plan field No. 470/8 in block No. 23 of Thrikkovilvattom Village
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Compromise Decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of compromise decree in OS. 887/2014 of Munsiff Court dated 07/08/2018
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Saboora Beevi vs Seenath regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saboora Beevi vs Seenath regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 04/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha.B. vs Madhusoodhanan regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between The Deity, Pavoor Thekkathil Sree Bhadra Devi Temple et al vs K.K.Vijayan regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Anil Kumar Celine Fernandez et al vs Socrates John regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won