Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 19/2024

Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
approximately-1 year 18 days
Case Closed
Fri, 02/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sheen B.Netto, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Johnson and Sreelatha, to prevent them from trespassing on his property and causing damage. The case involves a dispute over adjacent properties in Kolllam.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. They are restrained from trespassing upon the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. They are restrained from trespassing upon the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and right to enjoyment of the property, remaining unchallenged by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and right to enjoyment of the property, remaining unchallenged by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ext. A1 and A2 documents would prove the apprehension of the plaintiff regarding trespass into the plaint schedule property by the defendants. Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from causing any obstructions to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheen B.Netto
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreelatha
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 62/2021, Land Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mundakkal R.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Monica Saji Richard
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshma Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajeswari.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pooja Rajendran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Laila M.H
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Sharaf
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanently restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from causing any obstructions to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint schedule property by the plaintiff and also from committing any waste, damage, nuisance or mischief therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession of plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms that the plaintiff is remitting land tax for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pushparajan.P. vs Mohanan regarding Injunction
Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Thankam et al vs Anila et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between B. Bhasi vs Udayan et al regarding Temporary injunction
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anil Kumar Celine Fernandez et al vs Socrates John regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won