Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.318/2023

Case between B. Bhasi vs Udayan et al regarding Temporary injunction

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

B. Bhasi, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Udayan and others to prevent them from demolishing and obstructing the reconstruction of a compound wall on his property. The plaintiff claims ownership and possession of the property while the defendants contest the claims.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from demolishing the remaining portion of the compound wall until the suit is disposed. The second application for injunction was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondents and their men are restrained from demolishing the remaining portion of the compound wall of the plaint schedule properties.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from demolishing the remaining portion of the compound wall until the suit is disposed. The second application for injunction was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case of possession and ownership of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
According to the plaintiff he is the owner in possession of plaint schedule properties, which situates within well defined compound walls on all sides. The plaintiff put forth an apprehension that the defendants are trying to demolish the remaining portion of the compound wall.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I am of the view that an interim injunction order is to be passed against the respondents, restraining them from demolishing the remaining portion of the southern boundary wall of plaint schedule properties. Thus, points 1 to 3 are answered accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B. Bhasi
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udayan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Upendrakumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathyadevan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photo Copy of Gift deed No.964 of Eravipuram Sub Register Office, Copy of Tax receipt issued from Mundakkal village office, Copy of Location Sketch issued from Mundakkal Village Office
Defendants Documents
Reply Notice (Copy) to Assistant Engineer, Kollam Muncipal Corporation, Letter No.TPEZ/1758/23 from Kollam Muncipal Corporation

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P Gopalakrishnapillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kishore.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To restrain the defendants from demolishing the remaining portion of the compound wall.
Evidence:
IA 01/2023 is allowed as follows: The respondents and their men are restrained from demolishing the remaining portion of the compound wall of the plaint schedule properties on its any side and from committing any waste therein, until the disposal of the suit.
Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
To restrain the defendants from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff in reconstructing the demolished portion of the compound wall.
Evidence:
IA 02/2023 is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of ownership and tax payment for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Clarifies the layout and boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Responds to issues regarding the encroachment and construction.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter from Kollam Municipal Corporation
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Addresses the notice issued regarding the encroachment on drainage.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Photos
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the defendants' claims regarding property condition.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details findings regarding the plaint schedule property as examined by the commission advocate.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Encroachment of drainage
Case Code
Case between B. Bhasi vs Udayan et al regarding Temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between B. Bhasi vs Udayan et al regarding Temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pushparajan.P. vs Mohanan regarding Injunction
Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Thankam et al vs Anila et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anil Kumar Celine Fernandez et al vs Socrates John regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sheen B.Netto vs Johnson, Sreelatha regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won