| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 21 - 25 of 348

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 626 /2022

Ernakulam

2025-06-23

approximately-3 years 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 725/2022

Ernakulam

2025-04-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P A Jihas et al vs Edwin Correya et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 725 /2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

approximately-0 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1125/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-06

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 292/2025

2025-03-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

41%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 348 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Tax receipt (in 47 cases)
Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 25 cases)
Sketch (in 17 cases)
Sale deed (in 17 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 142
Defendant Won: 179

179

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

47%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 47 cases (47%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often could not present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Counsel Lacked Instructions

Plaintiffs' counsel reported having no instructions from their clients, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Meet Legal Requirements

Plaintiffs sometimes failed to meet necessary legal processes, such as filing fees or proper representation.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Counsel Lacked Instructions

Failure to Meet Legal Requirements

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?