| Niyamam AI

Displaying 91 - 95 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 592/2021

Kozhikode

2025-11-15

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018

Kozhikode

2025-11-21

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.124/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Frequent dismissals were due to plaintiffs not appearing during hearings or trials.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Some cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs' counsel did not press the matter during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Representation

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs failed to have legal representation present during hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Not Pressed by Counsel

Failure to Provide Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?