| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 86 - 90 of 348

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kadiyamu vs Saidalavi Haji et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 358 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-08-04

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kalamannayil Kunhalavi vs Valakkandan Koya et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 84 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-07-21

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Balakrishnan vs Sarada regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 367 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-07-20

Unknown

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding restoration of the suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 497 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-07-03

3 years 6 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulaiman C vs Abdul Kalam Asad regarding injunction and damages

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1199 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-07-03

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

41%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 348 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Tax receipt (in 47 cases)
Commission Report (in 40 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 25 cases)
Sketch (in 17 cases)
Sale deed (in 17 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 142
Defendant Won: 179

179

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearing

Multiple cases dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during critical hearings.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

No Legal Representation

Dismissals frequently occurred due to the plaintiff's lack of legal counsel during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Compliance

Cases were dismissed for default when plaintiffs did not comply with procedural requirements like fee payments.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearing

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

No Legal Representation

Default Due to Non-Compliance

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?