| Niyamam AI

Displaying 101 - 105 of 752

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Chellappan vs Santha regarding easement by declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 88/2018

Vaikom Taluk

2025-01-31

approximately-6 years 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thankappan vs Jineesh.P.U regarding fixation of boundary.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 105/2022

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chandravally vs Radhamani et al regarding partition and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. 326/2022

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leelamma Joseph vs Roy et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. 52/2019

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ajesh A.R. vs Anoop A.R. et al regarding partition and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. 153/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs frequently failed to establish ownership over disputed properties, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during proceedings, indicating a lack of engagement.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Plaintiffs often could not provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Previous Litigation Outcomes

Several cases were dismissed based on prior litigation that resolved the issues in favor of defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Previous Litigation Outcomes

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?