| Niyamam AI

Displaying 611 - 615 of 752

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 541/2020

Ernakulam

2025-11-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-10-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ramani vs Chundayil Ammunni Amma et al regarding Partition

Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 249 OF 2015

2019-11-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 920/2020

Ernakulam District, Kerala

2025-12-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1463/2018

Ernakulam

2025-12-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs frequently failed to establish ownership over disputed properties, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during proceedings, indicating a lack of engagement.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Plaintiffs often could not provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Previous Litigation Outcomes

Several cases were dismissed based on prior litigation that resolved the issues in favor of defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Previous Litigation Outcomes

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?