| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 476 - 480 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sakkariya vs Abdullakkutty regarding rent arrears and eviction

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 32 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-31

Approximately 2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammad Haji vs Kadavath Muhammad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 62 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-10-27

4 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Kalathil Parambil Enthen's daughter et al vs Sasidharan regarding rented premises dispute

Petition under Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 30 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-10-26

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court or lacked legal representation, leading to dismissals.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed when the petitioners or their counsel chose not to pursue the claims further.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs often did not present enough evidence to substantiate their claims or entitlement, leading to dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction or Validity

Some cases were dismissed due to the court's lack of jurisdiction or the invalidity of the claims made.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Claims

Lack of Jurisdiction or Validity

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?